When Curation Turns You Into a Content Thief

Content curation was supposed to help you stay sharp, not turn your feed into a glorified flea market. But here we are: small brands now shovel out curated noise and wonder why their engagement smells like yesterday’s leftovers.

Yes, audiences might not audit your posting habits, but their instincts do — and they’re quietly filing you under "reseller of recycled thoughts."

You think you're building authority? What you're really building is a garage sale nobody wants to visit twice. Look, if your idea of a strategy is reposting Medium articles with a thumbs-up emoji, congratulations: you’ve curated yourself out of credibility.

Let’s talk about why that ‘strategy’ isn't hiding the creative bankruptcy anymore.

Fine Line between “Curating Smart” and “Creative Bankruptcy”

There’s content curation. And then there’s posting like you owe your feed child support.

You know this already, but it needs to be said aloud: reposting other people’s brilliance without commentary isn’t “keeping your audience informed.” It’s announcing that you’ve run out of anything original to say — and you're hoping no one notices.

Even William Arruda, one of the most respected voices in personal branding, didn’t sugarcoat it:

Exactly.

That endless scroll is where engagement goes to rot. Because while your repost might earn a polite like or two, it rarely earns trust. People know the difference between leadership and maintenance. One builds credibility. The other just keeps the lights on.

Reposting without Context Isn’t Strategy

A curated feed without context is like sending Christmas cards to random addresses. Creepy. Pointless. And slightly embarrassing if someone actually opens it.

Smart social media content curation doesn’t mean dumping articles on your audience like a forgetful intern. It means selecting content that adds to a conversation you’re already leading. If the post doesn’t have at least 2–4 lines of personal commentary, relevance, or opinion, it’s not curated — it’s cloned.

And that subtle difference is exactly what separates the best content curation platforms from digital dumpsters. A good platform helps you filter. A better one helps you annotate, frame, and schedule with actual intention — not just velocity.

Content Curation vs Content Creation

Here's what most folks get wrong in the content curation vs content creation debate: they treat them like separate teams. They’re not. Curation should support your ideas — not replace them entirely.

Google’s own guidelines emphasize original, insightful content. That means curated content must deliver a fresh layer of value. No framing? No relevance? Then yes, you're filing your strategy under “creative bankruptcy” and wondering why your SEO looks like an unpaid intern set it up.

How Content Curation is Crippling Your SEO

There’s a difference between being strategic and being lazy with a scheduling tool. You already know which side endless content curation lands on.

If your idea of content curation for SEO is dumping other people’s content into your blog like a late-night buffet of borrowed thoughts, you’re already bleeding traffic. Quietly. And consistently. Google’s not punishing you — it’s just... unimpressed. According to 2023 report on the Helpful Content Update, sites relying heavily on regurgitated material saw up to 17% drops in organic traffic — some lost visibility altogether.

Google Doesn’t Want Your “Thought Recycling Program”

If your content reads like a classroom bulletin board — random links, re-shared snippets, meaningless quotes — it’s tanked before it even loads. Google officially calls this a failure to provide original value. In human terms? “Thanks for the copy-paste collage. You’re dismissed.”

Google’s official update states that any site “created for search engines rather than people” is deprioritized. What they’re not saying (but we all know): zero-effort curation doesn’t just underperform. It signals that you’ve stopped thinking for yourself.

And no, automating that mess with a shiny tool doesn't make it better — it just makes it faster. Automated content curation isn’t inherently bad, but treating it as a strategy instead of a shortcut? That’s where marketers get blindsided.

Why Your Audience Hates It (Even If They Don’t Say It)

People don’t need you to curate what they already saw on Twitter three hours ago. And they especially don’t need it without context.

Look…even when audiences don’t consciously complain, their brains do. According to research, when content lacks novelty or emotional contrast, the brain’s response is measurably weaker. It’s tied to a psychological effect called cognitive ease. Familiarity makes things easier to process, yes — but repetition without newness feels irrelevant. Your reader subconsciously tunes out.

So if your content sounds like what every other marketer said yesterday — only with slightly nicer formatting — congrats. You’ve become background noise. Again.

{{cta-component}}

Curation without Commentary Is Just Freeloading

This part hurts, but it needs to be said: reposting a link with no POV isn’t marketing. It’s freeloading. And it’s the exact opposite of SEO-effective behavior.

You can’t call yourself a strategist if your feed looks like a Pinterest board that forgot to think. Smart curation requires framing. Commentary. Original thought. If your caption is just a clapping emoji and a link to someone else’s case study, you’re not a thought leader. You’re a human RSS feed.

And you know what? Search engines notice. They track dwell time, click depth, bounce rates — and curated content without unique framing sends all of those into freefall.

The Saints and Sinners of Content Curation

There’s a thin, desperate line between being one of the top content curation websites — and being the digital equivalent of a clearance bin. And brands cross it more often than they’d like to admit.

Some do it with intention. Others? Well, they just... repost things and pray no one notices.

Adobe: The Saint Who Gets It

Adobe doesn’t guess. They don’t "hope for engagement." They run a smart content curation strategy rooted in original thought — often blending their own creative commentary with curated inspiration. Their B2B social arms, especially in segments like Adobe Express and Creative Cloud for Teams, saw up to 2x engagement increases when pairing curated educational links with original, branded insights that actually say something.

Not just reposting. Not just linking. Adding context.

That distinction matters. And clearly, audiences can tell the difference.

Yahoo

Yahoo, once a tech gatekeeper, slowly devolved into an aggregation treadmill. They didn’t lack volume. They lacked value. The feed became a stream of headlines from other outlets — no insight, no framing, no edge. Just more.

Curated content won’t save you from irrelevance if you’ve already outsourced your thinking.

It’s Not the Tools. It’s the Intent.

There are plenty of top content curation websites out there. Tools that do the scraping, aggregating, filtering. They’re useful — until they’re not. If your curation tool is filling your feed faster than your brain can process what’s going out, you’re not curating. You’re only broadcasting white noise with someone else’s logo on it.

The minute you remove your own thinking from the content process — even if it's just a single sentence of framing — you've exited the conversation. You’re no longer participating. You’re just amplifying.

How to Curate Like a Mad Genius

If your idea of “smart content curation” is dumping links like an unsupervised Slack thread, let’s start over.

Real curation is a strategy that tickles dopamine. Content that triggers surprise, novelty, or fresh value sees higher engagement. The brain responds to new + useful. Not reheated + obvious.

So if you’re not getting clicks, shares, or anything beyond polite silence, your curation isn’t clever. It’s copy-pasting with more steps.

Add Commentary or Don’t Bother

This is the bare minimum. You don’t repost without context. Ever.

Because nobody likes a streaker unless it’s funny — and right now, you’re just reposting naked ideas with zero interpretation. Every time you hit publish without a single sentence of framing, you’re telling your audience, “I found this, but I have no idea why it matters.”

At the very least, give them a reason to care. A stat to chew on. A perspective to consider. A takeaway to save. That’s what separates curating like a genius from dumping links like a robot.

Relevance Isn’t Optional

Curated content without relevance is worse than noise — it’s confusion in slow motion. If the article you’re sharing has nothing to do with what your audience is facing today, skip it. You don’t win credibility by posting smart stuff. You win by posting timely smart stuff.

Timing makes you look awake. And these days, that’s rare enough to be respected.

ZoomSphere’s Analytics helps you track what's working right now. Not only what performed well three months ago. Use the analytics, segment by behavior, and match what you share with what people actually interact with. That's the best practice.

Keep the Ratio. Or Keep Losing Relevance.

Top marketers work within a real content ratio: 65% original, 25% curated, 10% syndicated. That’s what keeps your brand from sounding like a remix album of other people’s takes.

Ignore the balance, and your audience will ignore you right back.

And if you're using curated content as a way to dodge hard thinking? Cool. But call it what it is.

So sure — curate. But don’t forget to comment. Contextualize. Critique. Challenge. Lead.

Cap Your Curation Before It Becomes a Crutch

Here’s the truth nobody likes to say out loud: the 25%–30% curation cap exists because marketers need limits. Without them, curation becomes camouflage for creative apathy.

You don't get to “balance” your feed with 80% borrowed links and call it a strategy. That’s not balance. That’s branding-by-echo.

Stick to the ratio. Or at the very least, stop pretending your weekly roundup of Medium links is thought leadership.

Switch the Format Before People Stop Looking

Text links are tired. Carousels. Short-form threads. Mini commentaries. Short videos that connect the dots. These are the minimum expectations.

You don’t have to chase every format. But if all you’re posting is the same shared headline, formatted the same way, in the same box every time — you're training your audience to scroll past you. Automatically.

Don’t Clone. Lead.

If you remember nothing else, take this with you: you can’t curate effectively if you’re just copying what’s already viral. The internet already has BuzzFeed. You’re not helping by being BuzzFeed’s slightly quieter cousin.

This is about how to curate content effectively without cloning your competitors. Which means using tools that help you think with the platform, not against it.

And content curation tools are only as sharp as the human behind them. So, you don’t need more content. You need clearer context, better timing, and the guts to say something when you share something.

That’s what separates mad genius from mildly confused.

The Few Real (and Rare) Benefits of Content Curation

Let’s be clear: content curation is not the problem. Abusing it like a caffeine patch for your dried-up ideation tank is the problem.

When done right — and that’s a big if — curation earns its place. But only as seasoning. It’s not the turkey. It never was. Yet too many marketers keep dishing it out like it’s the whole meal.

Authority Needs More Than Just Links

One of the real benefits of content curation is its power to signal authority — but only when you mix it with your own analysis. Sharing relevant content without attaching your point of view doesn’t make you insightful. It makes you a messenger. A branded middleman. And no one follows a mouthpiece unless there’s something worth quoting.

Add your commentary. Explain the “why.” That’s where trust comes from. No voice, no edge. Just noise.

{{form-component}}

It Can Prove You’re Paying Attention (If You Actually Are)

There’s also value in using curation to show real-time awareness. Trends shift fast. When your audience sees you posting content that reflects today — not six weeks ago — you signal relevance.

The fresher the insight, the more valuable the brain thinks it is. Research shows that new information tied to real-time events is perceived as significantly more useful than recycled data, even when the content quality is identical.

But again, recency without relevance is just newsfeed anxiety in brand form. Don’t curate because it’s “new.” Curate because it’s needed — right now.

You Might Save Time — But Not the Kind You Think

Here’s the part everyone gets wrong: content curation doesn’t save you time on strategy. It saves you time on execution. That’s it.

You still need to decide what matters, why it matters, and who it matters to. If you’re using curation to avoid thinking altogether, you're not saving time. You’re just outsourcing your standards.

Smart marketers use curation to reduce publishing friction — not to replace having a brain.

Real Brands Build Ideas — The Rest Just Retweet Them

If content curation is still your main course, don’t be surprised when your brand’s voice sounds like background noise at a dentist’s office. Real marketers build ideas; they don’t just reshuffle someone else's scraps onto a nicer plate.

The brands winning now are mixing curation with creation like it’s a science, not a desperate Tuesday night. They know that trust dies fast when audiences smell a copycat. Authenticity isn’t just a trend — it's the minimum fee to stay in the room (ask anyone who's marketing to Gen Z).

Get serious about your ideas. Tighten your content curation strategy before your relevance slides out the side door.

ZoomSphere’s got tools that actually help you think, not just repost.

You Posted Pretty… But Got Pity

You want social media engagement? Cool. So does everyone else.

You made it clean. Branded. Caption sprinkled with emojis and wisdom. The post was so wholesome it could babysit your nephew.

And yet—flatline.

No saves. No shares. A pity-like from your intern, and one rogue comment: “love this 💕” (from a skincare bot).

It’s not that your content is bad. It’s that it’s harmless.

And in 2025, harmless doesn’t trend.

This isn’t about being loud or edgy. It’s about understanding the silent funeral happening every day under your posts—and why being “nice” is often the first sign your content’s already been ghosted.

The Case Against “Nice” Content

Nice Gets You Nowhere (Except Maybe Filtered Into Obscurity)

If you think social media engagement for brands is about polishing posts until they squeak, you’re about two years late — and roughly 300 algorithm updates behind. “Nice” content doesn’t get punished. It gets ignored so efficiently.

Platforms in 2025 only reward reaction. Something needs to hit. Hard enough that a bored thumb hesitates. But mildly pleasant, visually neat posts don’t hesitate anything. They’re processed like a limp handshake: received, registered, forgotten.

According to Search Engine Land, 58.5% of Google searches in the U.S. now end without a single click. Not one. People skim, extract, and move. No clicks. No engagement. No loyalty. Just passive consumption — which, in algorithmic terms, is death by boredom.

And don’t think social media is doing any better. Based on Social Insider’s 2025 benchmarks, Instagram’s engagement has already crashed by 28% year-over-year. That drop is a direct result of users developing what we’d call "engagement anemia" — a complete physiological intolerance for content that doesn’t make them feel something real.

The Problem With Being Polished and Painless

The truth nobody likes to spell out is, polished often reads as emotionally neutral. “Nice” posts feel mass-produced, safe, dipped in an anti-septic rinse of brand guidelines — and audiences can smell it faster than you can say “jack.”

Humans actually have a negativity bias baked into their operating systems. We respond faster and more intensely to things that shock, annoy, thrill, or challenge us than to anything that’s simply “nice.”

Negativity bias + emotional salience = engagement currency

If your content doesn’t spark a minor “wait, what?” or at least a flash of curiosity, it’s already halfway buried. In today’s algorithmic bloodsport, passive likes are just filler signals. They don’t boost you. They barely keep you breathing.

It’s not enough to post content that people “appreciate.”

If they don’t share, comment, argue, or save it, you didn’t win anything — you just got processed and forgotten.

The Algorithm Is Ruthless

Nobody wants to say it because it sounds mean, but look… the algorithm isn’t punishing you. It’s just too busy rewarding someone else.

It’s not sabotaging your beautifully polite, polished content. It’s treating it exactly the way it treats every other polished, polite post: like vapor.

Algorithms today just don’t care about your brand guidelines, color palettes, or inspirational captions pulled from LinkedIn circa. They’re programmed to chase response — fast, emotional, volatile.
And if you’re posting content that looks like a motivational desk calendar? Good luck getting a fraction of that.

Polished Doesn’t Perform. Raw Does.

It’s not theory anymore — it’s quantifiable. Platforms are increasingly tuned to favor watch time, saves, shares, and comment spikes. A passive scroll-past doesn’t move the needle. A “nice post” that earns a half-smile and no action doesn’t even register.

You want social media engagement strategies that actually survive 2025?

Start reading the room:

Brands like Ryanair, Scrub Daddy, and even the NBA are throwing out the legacy polish. They post things that seem a little rough, a little chaotic, and very, very alive.

And when you match this against global social media engagement statistics and industry engagement benchmarks, the reality doesn’t get softer.
It gets colder.

Your content isn't getting "less reach." It’s getting treated exactly as it behaves: silently, forgettably, and without urgency.

So, the algorithms didn’t move the goalposts. They just stopped pretending polish was interesting.

What You’re Not Doing Well

There’s a harsh little irony to social media engagement strategies in 2025:
Brands post more content than ever. Yet engagement rates keep bleeding out faster.

If you’re wondering why posting polished carousels still isn’t moving the dial, here’s a blunt truth:
You’re doing it by the book.
And the algorithm’s using that same book to wipe the floor with you.

As Matt Navarra pointed out:

Brands clinging to polish without emotional ignition are bleeding out reach — quietly, but visibly.

Instagram’s brand engagement has already reduced by 28%. And somehow, against all basic survival instinct, most brands responded by... posting even safer, nicer visuals.

If you’re waiting for a polite post to storm the gates of attention, you're going to be waiting until the algorithm puts your reach on hospice care.

The Hall of Unforgivable Posting Sins

You want to know why your engagement’s flatlining?

It’s usually one of these self-inflicted wounds:

• Posting without a hook.
  If your opening line couldn’t wake a houseplant, don’t expect it to wake an algorithm.
• Caring more about design than the first sentence.
  Your grid looks gorgeous. Nobody cares. Attention is hijacked by words first, visuals second.
• Writing captions like you're terrified someone might comment.
  Safe, agreeable captions aren’t just boring. They’re anti-conversation. They’re digital white noise.
• Hiding from conflict, humor, or opinion.
  If your brand voice sounds like a legal disclaimer, expect engagement levels to match.

Real Engagement Demands Risk, Not Perfection

Social media engagement best practices in 2025 aren’t about “consistency” or “brand tone guidelines” anymore. They're about creating a disruption spike — a moment where someone actually stops what they’re doing because your post grabbed something inside their chest.

This is doubly true for social media engagement for small businesses. When you don’t have millions of ad dollars cushioning your mistakes, every post has to live or die by whether it creates emotional friction.

And no, this doesn't mean being edgy for the sake of it.
It means not posting like you’re scared to get noticed.

Because right now, the algorithm’s brutal math doesn’t care how good your Canva templates are.
It cares if you’re interesting enough to stop a scroll.

If not?
You’re not invisible because you posted too little.
You’re invisible because you posted too safely.

{{cta-component}}

Metrics That Matter (and the Ones Lying to Your Face)

Your Likes Don’t Mean Anything If Everyone Keeps Scrolling

You see, those likes are not performance. They’re not validation. They’re not even mildly interesting to the algorithm anymore. At best, they’re a soft acknowledgment that your post existed. At worst, they give you just enough hope to keep posting fluff that no one saves, shares, or comments on — and that’s the part the algorithm actually tracks.

If you’re obsessing over like counts, you’re measuring vanity, not value.
What matters in 2025 is what stays, what spreads, and what sparks noise.

And here’s the most embarrassing part:
A post with 300 likes and 0 shares has less algorithmic value than a scrappy one with 17 saves and 4 emotionally-charged comments.
Because engagement isn’t about applause anymore — it’s about action.

The Real Formula (That Most Still Get Wrong)

The proper social media engagement rate formula isn’t just about what you see at a glance. It’s this:

(Likes + Comments + Shares + Saves) / Reach x 100

But when was the last time you obsessed over your saves the way you stalked likes?

According to research, comments, saves, and shares all carry significantly more weight in most platform algorithms than likes. And the gap is only widening — especially on TikTok and Instagram.

The algorithm’s logic is simple:

• Shares = friction.
• Saves = value.
• Comments = relevance.
• Likes = background noise.

If you're still reporting social media engagement metrics without separating those signals out, you're letting fluff distract from the fire.

The Metrics Table Nobody Wants to Admit Is This Simple

Feel a little betrayed? Good. Now do something about it.

Start Using Tools That Actually Show You the Right Signals

If your social media engagement tools are just feeding you top-line vanity graphs with no way to dig into which posts drove real action, scrap them.

You need to be measuring what algorithms are actually tuned to reward — not what makes stakeholders feel good in a Monday slide deck.

What Actually Works in 2025

You’re not being shadowbanned. You're being outperformed — by brands that post things you would never get past your internal comms Slack thread.

The rules have changed. The algorithm isn’t filtering based on polish anymore. It’s rewarding pattern disruption. Friction. Audacity. Anything that makes a user stop, even for a second, and think: “Wait… what?”

You want to know how to increase engagement on social media right now?

You have to stop pretending you’re a museum and start acting like you’ve got something worth reacting to.

What’s Working Now? The Opposite of What Most Brands Are Posting

There’s no official rulebook. But if there were, it would have a giant disclaimer that says:
“Forget what worked in 2019.”

Here’s what’s driving real engagement in 2025:

• Posts that say the opposite of what people expect — not to be edgy, but because contrarian = curiosity.
• Series-style carousels that bait people with an open loop — slide one teases, slide three triggers a comment.
• Brands posting from the first person, admitting something uncomfortable. Example: “We lost engagement for 3 weeks. Here's why.”
• A tone that feels just unhinged enough to make a user scroll back up and think, “Wait, was that deliberate?”

Look at Liquid Death, Ryanair, Duolingo, The NBA — not for their shock value, but for the way they use emotional friction to force micro-decisions. And those micro-decisions — a pause, a save, a swipe-back — are everything now.

There’s Psychology Behind This. And It’s Brutal.

Algorithms are trained to reward what humans respond to. And humans, inconveniently, respond best to things that:

• Break patterns
• Reflect how they think (mirror neurons)
• Let them feel smart or in-the-know when they share it (status signaling)

If your brand isn’t playing into these psychological triggers, then it’s just broadcasting into a room that’s already full of better distractions.

{{form-component}}

You Don’t Need to Be Risky. You Only Need to Be Relevant

This isn’t a call to burn down your tone of voice. It’s a call to make sure your content doesn’t sound like you wrote it in a boardroom with three risk officers breathing down your neck.

Raw truth, friction, data-backed opinion — that’s the new engagement baseline.

And if you need a smarter way to track which posts are actually pulling emotional weight, not just fake engagement?

That’s where ZoomSphere becomes non-optional. You can’t grow what you won’t measure. You definitely can’t fix what you aren’t even noticing.

Algorithm’s Not the Enemy

If your social media engagement feels like a pity party lately, it’s not because you broke some secret rule.

It’s because “nice” content is a quiet way to tell algorithms, “Please ignore me.”

You don’t need softer visuals or deeper quotes. You need friction, questions, interruptions—the stuff that makes people stop mid-scroll like they just spotted an open bar at a dry wedding.

Tomorrow, post something your CEO would sweat over. Not offensive. Just alive.

Watch who flinches. Watch who shares.

Because if your content can’t spark a reaction, it’ll spark a scroll. One way or another, you choose how fast you disappear.

Welcome to your weekly Friday rundown of everything chaotic, clever, and quietly game-changing that happened in social media.

From TikTok testing your attention span to LinkedIn embracing creators, we’ve got plenty to unpack. So grab a coffee (or something stronger) and let’s dive in.

What’s New on TikTok?

TikTok Is Getting Longer (Like, Way Longer)

Remember when TikTok was a 15-second app? Yeah, neither do we. The platform has officially started rolling out 60-minute video uploads to more users, turning it into a legit YouTube competitor.

Whether this is great for creators or a recipe for content chaos remains to be seen. But it’s safe to say the definition of “short-form” is getting blurrier by the day.

What’s New on LinkedIn?

LinkedIn Finally Wants to Pay Creators (Sort Of)

Say hello to BrandLink, LinkedIn’s first real move toward creator monetization. It connects advertisers with big-name creators like Gary Vaynerchuk, Rebecca Minkoff, Guy Raz, and Steven Bartlett, allowing them to run in-stream video ads next to exclusive editorial content.

Early results are promising: 130% higher video completion rates, 23% higher view rates, and 18% more likelihood to convert compared to standard video ads.

This could mark the rise of the B2B influencer era, or at least LinkedIn’s bet on it.

{{cta-component}}

LinkedIn Breaks Another Engagement Record

LinkedIn is thriving. In Microsoft’s latest earnings report, the platform reported record-high engagement levels again.

According to the update, LinkedIn saw a 9% increase in sessions this quarter, but that’s actually down from 11% the same time last year. While Microsoft has been calling every quarter a "record" since 2018 (yes, really), this time they actually gave us more than just vague praise:

• Time spent watching video is up 36% year-over-year
• Comments are up 32%
• Premium Company Page signups grew 75% (although that’s likely just because the feature became more widely available)

Its also worth noting that while LinkedIn boasts over a billion members, its active user base is estimated at around 300 million. So yes, engagement is up, but maybe take “record levels” with a grain of salt.

{{form-component}}

What’s New on Threads?

Threads Hits 350M Active Users

Threads just passed 350 million monthly active users, which makes it one of the fastest-growing social platforms this year.

Whether it’s here to stay (RIP Clubhouse) is still TBD, but for now, the growth is very real.

What’s New on Instagram?

Instagram’s Story Levels Up With “Collage”

Instagram is testing a new “Collage” format in Stories, and more users are now getting access. It’s a sticker that lets you add and rearrange multiple photos into one story layout (scrapbook vibes, anyone?).

Think of it as Canva built right into the app. A small change, but potentially big for aesthetic-obsessed creators.

April Content Recap

This week, Mosseri is taking a break at a creators event (it was a quiet week, wasn't it?). But in case you missed anything from the crazy month of April, here's the rundown of what Instagram has dropped last month:

• Launch of the Edits app: Instagram’s version of CapCut
• Introduction of Reels Blends: shared Reels feeds with friends
• Testing of Community Notes
• And much more!

In 2025, "cringe" isn’t the career-ending mistake it used to be. It’s the whole marketing strategy.

The brands winning today aren’t the ones posting perfectly polished ads or carefully curated Instagram grids. They’re the ones embracing chaos, posting unhinged TikToks, and leaning so hard into awkwardness that you can’t help but stop scrolling, whether you’re laughing with them or at them.

Welcome to the Cringe Era. Here, perfection is boring. Weirdness is currency.And if your brand isn’t at least a little embarrassing online, you’re basically invisible.

What Exactly Is Cringe Marketing, Really?

First things first: cringe marketing isn’t bad marketing.

It's not posting a typo-riddled press release or accidentally tweeting from the wrong account (RIP, corporate interns). Cringe marketing is intentional weirdness: posting content that’s awkward, chaotic, or self-deprecating on purpose to feel more real and relatable.

It’s the difference between being "out of touch" and "in on the joke."

In a world flooded with polished, algorithm-optimized content, brands that dare to be weird, messy, and a little bit cringe stand out. They're not trying to be perfect. They're trying to be human, and humans are inherently a little embarrassing sometimes.

The Psychology of Why Cringe Works

Cringe isn’t just internet chaos, it’s a psychological reaction. When we see something awkward, chaotic, or offbeat, our brains light up. It’s called vicarious embarrassment, that secondhand "oof" that makes you squirm, laugh, and want to send it to a friend immediately. It’s uncomfortable, it’s sticky, and most importantly, it’s memorable.

In an era of endless scrolling and polished sameness, cringe cuts through the noise because it feels human. It’s flawed. It’s real. It taps into emotional tension, curiosity, and the universal urge to say: “I can’t believe they posted that.”

But here’s the kicker: when it’s done intentionally and with self-awareness, cringe becomes relatable, shareable, and trust-building. Why? Because people don’t trust perfect brands anymore. They trust brands that act like people. And people are messy, awkward, and funny without trying to be.

In short: cringe content gets attention because it makes us feel something, whether it’s secondhand embarrassment or chaotic joy. And in 2025’s attention economy, feelings are what fuel reach.

Why Cringe Marketing Works in 2025

1. The Attention Economy Rewards Chaos

‍Scroll through TikTok or Instagram for two minutes. What stops you? It's rarely the perfect ad. It's the unhinged owl threatening to ruin your life if you skip your Duolingo lesson.

We’re so overloaded with "good" content that only the weird, unexpected stuff cuts through.

2. Cringe Feels Relatable

‍Perfect brands feel fake. Imperfect brands feel like friends.

Gen Z and millennials don't trust brands that seem too polished or curated. If you’re willing to laugh at yourself or post something a little dumb, it makes you seem real, and realness is what builds loyalty now.

3. Algorithms Love Engagement

‍Weird, chaotic posts drive shares, comments, stitches, and duets. People want to react, whether it’s "omg same" or "what the hell did I just watch." That engagement boosts reach, turning your cringe into clout.

Brands Absolutely Owning Their Cringe Era

Duolingo

‍The green owl has gone full goblin mode on TikTok, threatening users, thirst-trapping, and inserting itself into random viral trends. It's chaotic, hilarious, and it works: millions of followers, constant viral moments, and a brand that's somehow both educational and a meme.

Ryanair

‍The budget airline’s entire social media strategy is roasting passengers and posting cursed photos of planes. They’re not trying to look premium. They’re leaning into being cheap, savage, and funny. Result? Viral fame and cult-like loyalty.

Scrub Daddy

‍It’s… a sponge. But somehow Scrub Daddy has become a TikTok darling by posting surreal, absurd memes and unhinged product videos. They embraced weirdness and now a cleaning product is a cultural icon.

Liquid Death

‍It’s just water. But marketed like it's a heavy metal band, complete with skulls, horror movie ads, and completely unhinged campaigns. It’s a masterclass in selling a vibe over a product.

How to Nail Cringe Marketing Without Being Actually Cringe

• Be Self-Aware: The best cringe marketing knows it’s ridiculous. There’s a wink behind every chaotic post.
• Stay On-Brand: Your chaos still needs to match your brand’s voice. Liquid Death’s heavy metal energy works because it fits.
• Lean Into Memes, Don't Force Them: If you’re not naturally funny, amplify real user memes instead of trying to invent bad ones.
• Low-Production Wins: Quick, scrappy, "ugly" posts often outperform slick, overproduced ads. Don’t overthink it.

When Cringe Marketing Flops: Real-World Faceplants

Burger King's "Women Belong in the Kitchen" Tweet

‍They tried to spark conversation about female chefs. Instead, they led with a tone-deaf, sexist-sounding tweet that backfired instantly.

ZOA Energy’s “Big Dwayne Energy” Campaign

Zoa, the energy drink co-founded by Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson, rolled out a campaign centered around the phrase “Big Dwayne Energy” — a pun on, well, you know what. It was supposed to feel bold and funny… but instead felt like your gym coach trying to go viral. To make it worse, they were using the phrase months after it had already peaked online, making the whole thing feel like a brand arriving way too late to the party.

Totino's Gen Z Ad Campaign

‍Totino's attempted a TikTok-heavy "vibe" campaign that felt so manufactured and pandering that even the intended audience roasted it in the comments.

Lesson? If you’re forcing it, people feel it. If you don’t understand the joke, you are the joke.

Be Brave, Be Weird, Be (Strategically) Cringe

The brands that thrive today aren't the ones who play it safe. They're the ones willing to look a little dumb, a little weird, and a lot more real.

You don't need million-dollar ad budgets. You need guts. You need self-awareness. And you need to let go of the idea that "professional" automatically means "good."

Because in 2025, perfect marketing is dead. Cringe is the new clout.

Clickbait Isn’t Killing Credibility—Mediocre Content Is

Clickbait titles aren't the problem here—your underwhelming content is. And no, it’s not edgy to blame Google. It’s just convenient.

You followed the SEO handbook, ticked all the boxes, slapped on “insightful” in the meta description, and still… nada. Your headline promised gold, but your post handed out pocket lint. That’s not clickbait—it’s click fraud.

And did you know that 58.5% of searches end before a click ever happens? On mobile, it’s a quiet 77.2%. And only less than 1% of searchers even touch Page 2.

Look, if your title doesn’t drag eyeballs like it owes them money, you’re invisible.

And the problem isn’t that your headline over-promised. It’s that your content couldn’t even live up to mild interest.

Clickbait Got Framed. Again.

Clickbait didn’t crawl out of the digital gutter. It used to sit proudly on the front page of every major newspaper. Back then, we called it what it actually is: a headline. And you know what? It worked.

But somewhere along the way, marketers started writing headlines like they were afraid of offending... oxygen.

Meanwhile, titles with teeth—ones that make people feel something—got labeled “clickbait.” That’s convenient, right?

Let’s clear this up: clickbait in digital marketing isn’t the problem. It’s a behavioral shortcut. Humans chase unresolved tension. It’s science. You’re not “tricking” anyone—you’re using the same neural bait that’s been driving engagement since Gutenberg had a printing press.

But if your title teases brilliance and your content hands out nothingness, that’s not clickbait. That’s fraud.

Clickbait Wasn’t Born Evil. You Just Used It Wrong

You don’t blame salt for a bad dish. You blame the cook who dumped it on dry tofu and called it dinner.

Clickbait works when it leads to something worth the click. You didn’t get ghosted because you used a spicy headline—you got ghosted because what followed felt like a budget onboarding manual.

Look, it’s not clickbait vs. quality content. The winning combo is both. Real content with real stakes—fronted by titles that deserve their serotonin.

The problem is the lack of bite.

Respectable Doesn’t Rank. Relatable Does.

No one clicks on a sermon. They click on something that sounds like it might shake them a little.

Meanwhile, you’re out here writing “Q3 Social Media Performance Review,” wondering why no one bites. You’re losing to a kid who wrote “We Stopped Posting on Instagram for 30 Days—Here’s What Happened.”

So no, your clickbait didn’t “fail.” Your content just couldn’t keep the promise it made.

The ONLY Reason for Your Rising Bounce Rate

You Optimized for Google. Not for Humans.

If your bounce rate’s climbing like it’s trying to escape your analytics dashboard, it’s not the algorithm. It’s you. Specifically, it’s your half-hearted, SEO-flavored, keyword-stuffed ghost of a blog post.

You optimized for spiders. But humans clicked.

And the second they got past your carefully engineered meta description, they hit 700 words of what reads like a UN press release on digital marketing.

“Leverage today’s trends”? 

“Utilize modern tools”?

That’s not content.

That’s the stuff that gets you straight into your reader’s mental trash bin. Yes, you're showing up in search. You're just not staying in memory.

The Bounce Isn’t a Bug. It’s Feedback You Ignored.

Let’s call it what it is: most “SEO content” is a to-do list dressed up as strategy. The intro repeats the headline. The body adds nothing new. The outro says something about “staying ahead.”

The reader gets through the first paragraph and realizes this is a vending machine of recycled talking points. So they bounce. They don’t even hate it—they feel nothing. Which is worse.

You don’t lose clicks because your title overpromised. You lose them because the page never delivered anything close to quality content.

Out of every 1,000 searchers, only 360 click through. That’s your one shot. And you’re wasting it on “5 Tips for Better Marketing”? 

Really?

Headline Engagement Doesn’t Save Flat Content

Here's the part that stings: even if you’re nailing user engagement metrics for headlines—getting solid CTRs, scroll starts, session entries—none of it matters if your content gaslights the reader into asking, “Wait, that’s it?”

You can’t fix thin content with thick formatting. And you can’t fix weak value with numbered lists and Grammarly-proper grammar.

If you’re not actively improving content engagement with headlines and body, you’re just packaging disappointment. Yes, you ranked. But the reader left. Which means Google notices, and you drop. Again.

The fix isn’t more SEO. It’s actual substance. Your headline opened the door. But your content made them want to leave through the window.

What Titles That Actually Deserve Clicks Have in Common

There’s no such thing as a “neutral” headline. It either triggers dopamine or eye-rolls. There’s no middle ground in scroll territory.

Want to know how to write clickbait titles that actually convert?

Stop babying your copy.

Nobody’s rushing to click “5 Social Media Tips for 2025.” That’s digital snooze space. That’s content purgatory. That’s what happens when marketers try to be “respectable” instead of relevant.

The truth is, titles are psychological landmines—and the only way they explode (in your favor) is if you light them with intention. “Clickbait” is a signal. When it’s backed by actual value, it becomes one of the most effective clickbait strategies in your toolkit.

But here’s the catch: the title is only earned by what follows. If the content is limp, no headline on earth can save it.

Honestly, the Brain Doesn’t Want Facts. It Wants to Fill a Gap.

George Loewenstein’s Information Gap Theory is the invisible string pulling clicks across the internet. His research proved what you’ve probably felt a thousand times: if someone senses there’s something they don’t know, they’ll itch to close that loop.

That’s why the best-performing titles don’t just “inform”—they provoke. They create curiosity tension. The “wait… what?” effect.

If you’re not crafting compelling article titles that poke the brain’s reward system, you're just labeling your post. And that’s why you’re invisible.

Even worse… Titles that under-promise? 

They don’t “manage expectations.” They just fail to trigger anything worth a click.

So stop asking if your title “sounds professional.” Start asking: does it demand resolution?

Specificity Beats “Best Practices” Every Day of the Week

Safe titles are like corporate oatmeal. Edible, sure. But nobody wants it.

If you’re still writing “7 B2B Tools That Work,” congratulations—you just made content no one will click unless they’re legally required to.

Now compare that to:

“This $12 Tool Outranked Our $2K Stack—Here’s the Screenshot”

The first one says, “We followed a checklist.” The second one dares you not to click. That’s not magic. It’s data-backed reality. 

Backlinko found that titles with 10–15 words earn 1.76x more clicks than short, vague ones. So, specificity sells.

If your title doesn’t feel like it came from someone who actually has receipts, don’t expect traffic. In fact, don’t expect respect, either.

‍{{cta-component}}

Negativity Wins—Because Humans Are Wired for It

Don’t flinch. This isn’t about being dramatic. It’s about using Negative Bias to your advantage.

People are more drawn to avoid pain than to gain pleasure. It’s how we’re wired. That’s why “Top Marketing Tactics” gets shrugged at, while “7 Mistakes That Are Wrecking Your Content Strategy” gets opened by people mid-coffee sip.

You’re not scaring them—you’re respecting the emotional cost of staying uninformed. That’s where the attention lives.

Anyone telling you that positivity always outperforms is either selling rainbow templates or hasn’t seen a dashboard in months.

Look—headline optimization techniques don’t mean sterilizing every word. They mean leaning into what humans actually react to.

Fear of loss. Curiosity. Disbelief. Real stakes.

If your title doesn’t tap into one of those, it’s just sitting there. Looking nice. Doing nothing.

Zero-Click Search Optimization and Google’s Appetite for Free Labor

Zero-click search optimization is the corporate way of asking for your strategy deck and then saying, “Thanks, we’ll take it from here.”

You write the content. Google lifts the best line, slaps it into a featured snippet, and hands your traffic a pat on the head instead of a click. They get the engagement. You get breadcrumbs.

You rank. You optimize. You give great answers. And you lose the user before they ever meet your site.

This isn’t organic visibility. It’s unpaid labor with a byline.

Featured Snippets Don’t Have to Kill You—If You Know Where to Slice

Yes, featured snippets take your content and hand out answers like mints. But the solution isn’t to stop being valuable—it’s to stop giving away the entire plate in the preview.

If you want to optimize for Google’s featured snippets and still win the click, format like a surgeon. Use bold headers, clean lists, tables, and direct definitions—but only enough to answer the first question. Leave the follow-up (the juicy part) behind the click.

That’s how you trigger engagement without giving away the farm. It's also how you're improving content engagement—by writing with layered intent, not just surface-level answers.

Do it right, and you win both the snippet and the session. Do it wrong, and your post becomes the SERP’s unpaid fact box.

Google’s Not the Only One Automating You Into Extinction

Let’s talk about what’s actually creeping up behind you: generative engine optimization.

AI results are pushing organic content down even below the zero-click layer. Google’s Search Generative Experience (SGE) now offers AI summaries that pull from your content without your permission, payment, or traffic credit.

So if your content is generic, keyword-sprinkled piece, expect to be absorbed and replaced. The only way to stay immune to being paraphrased into nothing is to build content with voice, evidence, and sharp editorial edges.

Real commentary. Real specificity. Real analysis. Not AI sludge masquerading as insight.

Because Google's generative engines don’t plagiarize your tone—they ignore it entirely. And that’s the gap you can own.

If the Click is the Hook, Your Content is Dead

You know exactly what happened. The headline was bold. Tension? On point. CTR? Looking sexy.
Then… the user landed. And your content greeted them with the emotional depth of elevator music.

You teased chaos. You delivered conference-room-approved beige.

This isn’t about tone—it’s about substance. You lured them in with stakes, but fed them the same buzzword casserole everyone else serves.

Mark Schaefer, author of "Audacious: How Humans Win in an AI Marketing World," said it best:

That’s the litmus test. If your content can’t earn love—or loyalty—it doesn’t matter how clever your title was. You didn’t write clickbait. You wrote regret bait.

And they didn’t bounce because of “short attention spans.” They bounced because your page ran out of reasons to exist.

The SEO impact of clickbait titles doesn’t crash your traffic. But mediocre follow-through does. Search engines are downgrading you for making people regret tapping them.

The 3-Layer Test for Content That Doesn’t Suck

Want to keep what your headline catches? Run your content through this:

• Tension (Title) – A headline that raises a question your reader has to resolve. Not wants to. Has to.
• Depth (Body) – Not just “value.” Actual, differentiated insight. If it could be written by a content mill or an intern with ChatGPT, delete it.
• Payoff (CTA or Asset) – Give them something worth their time. A tool. A tactic. A case study. A “you’re welcome.”

And as John Jantsch, author of Duct Tape Marketing, puts it:

That’s the real trick, isn’t it? 

Make your content useful enough to earn attention, not baited interaction. This is how you start balancing clickbait and authenticity. It’s not about softening your headline. It’s about earning it.

When your content actually delivers, your clickbait becomes honest. That’s the win.

Interactive Content Earns Loyalty

Are you still slapping in a paragraph and a bullet list and calling it “engagement”? Stop.

Real attention is earned—and it doesn’t come from formatting alone.

Want to improve dwell time and actual retention? 

Add friction. Add interaction. 

Polls, quizzes, embedded calculators, real data tables, micro-case studies that show what actually happened. And yes—video.

Because video content integration increases organic traffic by 157%, according to Forbes. That’s what your competitors are using to stomp your engagement metrics into the carpet.

The real impact of your clickbait isn’t just clicks. It’s what users do after they land. And if what you’ve got is just a headline with no muscle behind it? They won’t stick around.

Stop Acting Like Being Interesting Is Dishonest

Somewhere along the way, marketers confused being “authentic” with being aggressively dull. You know the type: tone so sterile it reads like it was filtered through five rounds of approvals and a risk management team. No edge. No opinion. Just vibes—sponsored by copy-paste. 

And yet, here we are. Still having to say this: being interesting isn’t dishonest. It’s the bare minimum for relevance.

Nobody trusts content that feels like an onboarding PDF. We trust real people who talk like they mean it. The moment you start editing your voice down to polite neutrality, you start sounding like every other SEO zombie out there—and you lose trust, not gain it.

Clickbait Isn’t the Problem—It’s the Litmus Test

If your headline gets clicked, and your content delivers? Congratulations, you didn’t “trick” anyone—you won. And that’s not deception. That’s how high-performing quality content works.

But if you’re still treating clickbait like a moral failing, ask yourself: what exactly are you defending? The idea that your low-engagement blog is somehow more “authentic” because no one reads it?

There’s nothing noble about irrelevance.

Balancing clickbait and authenticity doesn’t mean dulling your edge. It means your content and your title agree on the value they’re offering. It means your hook hits hard, and your post doesn’t tap out by paragraph two.

Interesting content backed by substance isn’t clickbait. It’s just effective communication. And if the loudest thing in your post is the font weight, you’re not being authentic—you’re being forgettable.

{{form-component}}

Trust Comes From Attention, Not Tone

Let’s kill one more lie while we’re here: you do not build trust by being quiet. You build it by being consistently engaging. We trust brands that can hold our attention and don’t waste our time.

Want proof? 

Look at bounce rates. Look at average time-on-page. Look at repeat visitor behavior. None of them reward brands that “play it safe.”

You think trust is built through restraint? It’s not. It’s built through useful tension, unapologetic voice, and the rare ability to say something that doesn’t sound like a recycled LinkedIn post.

You’re not being edgy. You’re being necessary.

So no, you don’t need to whisper just to be believed. You need to stop being afraid of actually sounding human.

Clicks Don’t Lie. Your Content Does.

Your title got the click. That’s the proof. The intent was there. The problem is… your content didn’t show up.

You hooked them with tension and left them with recycled tips, SEO fluff, and a CTA written like it owed HR an apology. And now you’re blaming the headline?

No. That title did its job. The content didn’t.

So before you side-eye your CTR report, ask the real question:
Did your headline overpromise—or did your post just underdeliver?

Clicks are truth serum. They tell you who cared enough to show up. What happens next is all on your content.

Stop slandering clickbait. Start writing content that can actually hold the room—and maybe use a title that doesn’t whisper when it should command.

It’s Friday again, which means only one thing:
Your weekly round of updates you didn’t know you needed (but totally do) is here.

From Instagram trying to steal CapCut’s thunder to TikTok’s latest attempt to eat… Google Maps?!
Here’s what went down!

What’s New on Instagram?

Instagram Drop It's Own Editing App

CapCut, who? Instagram has officially launched Edits, a standalone app built for creators who want more control over their video content. According to Adam Mosseri, it's just the beginning.

“We’ve been building this alongside creators from day one,” Mosseri wrote. “Give it a try and let me know what other features you’d like to see!”

Spoiler: it's free (for now), and it's basically CapCut with a different branding.

Share Reels in New "Blends"

Another new update Mosseri shared on his Instagram profile was a new feature called Blends, which lets you and your friends (or a whole group chat) create a shared feed of Reels.

{{cta-component}}

What’s New on TikTok?

TikTok Tests Carousel Previews

TikTok is catching up with a much-needed feature: the ability to preview your carousel posts before hitting publish. It’s currently being tested on Android.

TikTok’s Review Tab Takes on Google Maps

Forget opening a new tab. TikTok is testing a reviews tab that lets users rate and review locations right inside the comments of tagged videos.

Whether it’s a café, park, or museum, you’ll now see:

• ⭐ User star ratings
• 📝 Written reviews
• 📸 User-submitted photos

It’s not available on every video (yet), but it’s another bold move in TikTok’s quest to dominate search.

What’s New on Threads?

Threads Adds Ads (Everywhere)

Ads are now officially global on Threads. That means sponsored content is coming to a feed near you, whether you like it or not.

For brands, this opens up a great opportunity to experiment with a new channel for their next campaigns.

{{form-component}}

Multiple Links Are Coming to Profiles

Soon, you won’t have to choose between your blog, store, and newest video link (or settle for just one Linktree link). Yay!