Your Brand Is Not Flawless. Stop Lying to Yourself.

You know your brand’s biggest marketing problem? It’s too perfect. And no, that’s not a compliment.

User-generated content campaigns are the reason people trust a stranger’s blurry selfie more than your high-budget ad shoot. That’s not my opinion—it’s a fact.

79% of consumers trust UGC more than brand-created content. They see it as 2.5x more authentic. Because when brands get involved, everything starts looking like a stock photo—polished, predictable, and painfully staged. Meanwhile, a customer’s unfiltered review hits like gospel.

So, let’s stop pretending your marketing team can outshoot reality. It’s time to hand over the mic, step out of the spotlight, and let your customers do what they already do best—sell your brand better than you ever could.

The Marketing Industry’s Open Secret—Your Brand Is Probably Lying (And People Know It)

Brands lie. Not always on purpose, of course—but consistently, and with impressive commitment. You probably don’t think you’re one of them. That’s cute.

Here’s what your audience sees: polished campaigns, scripted testimonials, and ads so clean they might as well have been scrubbed by legal before being dipped in lavender-scented brand guidelines. But your audience isn’t stupid. They're not buying your “seamless lifestyle solution,” and they can smell artificiality faster than your sales team can say “jack.”

And they’re over it.

Many consumers trust user-generated content over anything your team writes, no matter how hard you brainstormed during your latest strategy session. They trust strangers on Reddit more than your copywriters. They trust shaky unboxing videos more than your $30K studio shoots. And they definitely trust real customers who aren’t reading from a teleprompter.

Marketing to Gen Z

Now, let’s talk about Gen Z—because if you’re not already marketing to Gen Z with a working understanding of their digital B.S. meter, you're just funding your own irrelevance. This is a group raised on TikTok, not television. They don’t just want authenticity; they expect it. And when your ad looks a little too shiny, a little too clean, and a little too full of stock-smile diversity, they call it what it is: fake. And nothing drives Gen Z away faster than a ‘perfect’ ad that fails to feel human. And still, some brands cling to their gloss like it’s a survival instinct. Which is funny, because it’s actually the opposite.

Perfection is the fastest way to lose credibility. Relatability sells. Raw wins. And if your marketing still looks like it came out of a polished brand deck from 2012, don’t be surprised when your audience scrolls past it like a Terms & Conditions page.

Why UGC Turns Scrollers into Buyers

People don’t care what you say about your product. They care about what other people say about your product—especially if those people aren’t being paid to say it. That’s just human behavior.

Your audience doesn’t want a pitch. They want confirmation—from someone who looks like them, shops like them, and maybe even swears like them. That’s why many ‘perfect ads’ fail. Not because they’re bad. Because they’re fake. And because the second your content looks like it’s trying to impress, your viewers are already halfway back to scrolling videos of dogs doing taxes.

The Psychology Is Simple. So Why Are You Still Overthinking It?

People trust people. Period.

The more your content feels like a conversation instead of a press release, the more likely it is to convert. In fact, according to survey User-generated content boosts conversion rates by 29%. And that’s just from showing people what other people already said. No budget increase. No creative shoot. Just less control and more trust.

If your current user-generated content strategy doesn't reflect that, you’re not marketing—you’re decorating.

Create the Space—Your Audience Will Do the Rest

Here’s where it gets good. UGC doesn’t just work. It works harder, faster, and cheaper than anything your in-house team will ever write in a Slack thread.

Interactive content marketing formats—like polls, Q&As, or reviews—are already proven to drive up to 9x more engagement than traditional branded content. But the real winners are brands that know how to create viral marketing campaigns using their audience’s own voice.

Glossier’s billion-dollar valuation is built off selfies and skincare routines from regular people. Gymshark’s rabid fanbase is fueled by workouts recorded in living rooms, not production studios. They didn’t “scale content.” They just paid attention.

If you're still obsessing over word counts and campaign colors while ignoring the content your audience is already creating... congrats, you're running in circles while someone else takes your clicks.

Why You’ll Never ‘Own’ Your Narrative Again (And That’s a Good Thing)

Once upon a time, you called the shots. You crafted the message. You picked the Pantone, the tagline, the 'brand essence.' Now? Your narrative lives in the comments section, gets memed on TikTok, dragged on Reddit, and praised—or torched—by strangers who’ve never seen your brand book.

User-generated content in social media marketing isn’t is the new PR department. And guess what? It doesn’t report to you.

If that burns, good. That means you’re awake.

People Trust Carl from Amazon More Than Your CMO

There’s no delicate way to say this: your million-dollar marketing campaign gets outperformed by Karen’s blurry iPhone review—the one she recorded half-asleep in a bathrobe. And people believe her.

Why? Because she doesn’t sound like she’s trying to sell them anything. She sounds real.

According to a 2024 Consumer Research report, 40% of shoppers say UGC is “extremely” or “very” important when deciding what to buy.

Smart Brands Use UGC Platforms. Lazy Ones Watch from the Sidelines

If you’re still pretending UGC is optional, ask yourself why Airbnb, Sephora, and Gymshark build full campaigns around it. Then take a quiet moment to Google user-generated content platforms like Stackla, TINT, and Pixlee—tools built specifically so brands like yours can quit fumbling around with screenshots and spreadsheets and start actually organizing UGC like the high-stakes asset it is.

Want People to Talk About You? Stop Acting Too Cool to Ask.

You don’t need to bribe people to talk about your brand—you just need to give them something worth sharing. But please, stop handing out 5% discount codes like you’re doing them a favor.

Here’s how you actually encourage user-generated content without sounding desperate:

• Make UGC a badge of honor (Apple’s #ShotOniPhone).
• Share what your customers post. Loudly. Publicly.
• Incentivize creativity, not compliance. Give people room to interpret your brand.

If your customers are already creating content and you’re not leveraging it, you’re just leaving money on the table—and probably a lot of it.

You Can’t Script the Narrative. But You Can Steer It.

The illusion of narrative control is gone. But here’s the upside: you now have access to thousands—sometimes millions—of people willing to build your brand with you. Just let them.

Not because it’s trendy. Not because a marketing blog told you so. But because UGC is the loudest, most persuasive marketing voice you’ll never be able to replicate in-house.

And it’s already talking.

The only question is—are you smart enough to listen?

{{cta-component}}

The Brands Winning Big with UGC (And the Clueless Ones Getting Wrecked)

If you still think user-generated content is just free content, you're already two quarters behind. The rewards of user-generated content are measurable. And some brands are out here running full-scale campaigns using nothing but what their customers post. Not kinda working. Working better than anything they’ve paid for.

Let’s talk receipts.

Glossier has managed to convert 90% of its revenue from community-led channels, mainly through an army of customers who practically do the branding for them.

Ads? Barely.

What they rely on is interactive content marketing that builds real, continuous feedback loops.

GoPro doesn’t need to invent content—people submit 6,000+ pieces of UGC every single day. That’s a full content calendar, a library of ads, and a global media team... all unpaid. And no, that’s not exploitation. That’s the byproduct of designing a product that begs to be shared. And GoPro rewards user-generated content contributors with features, shoutouts, and viral recognition.

Lululemon’s #TheSweatLife is a consumer-led movement. They’ve hit over 1.4M tagged posts and counting. No expensive gimmicks. Just customers who feel seen, reposted, and part of something they helped build. It’s UGC done right: let your audience co-own the conversation.

Sephora weaponized its Beauty Insider Community in a way most brands still don’t understand. UGC flows through every layer of the brand, from tutorials and unboxings to loyalty reviews and topic threads. That community has become one of the brand’s most trusted assets, reinforcing the impact of user-generated content on brand trust and making traditional testimonials look prehistoric.

The Ones Who Still Think It’s 2010

Let’s not be coy—some brands are getting smoked because they’re still clinging to outdated playbooks that don’t even make it out of the algorithm gate.

Luxury labels that obsess over exclusivity while ignoring the internet’s community-driven engine? Good luck. The fashion world has shifted, and brands still trying to "curate an aura" are getting dragged in comment sections they don’t even monitor. TikTok is shaping luxury taste now—and when you act like you're too good for UGC, you just look disconnected.

Retail giants who ignore TikTok trends and still think “interactive content” means running a 10-question quiz will slowly fade into irrelevance. Nearly 70% of fashion and luxury brands already invest in user-driven TikTok marketing—because it works. It builds FOMO, fuels engagement, and drives conversions without sucking up your entire ad budget.

Did You Know… Not Using UGC Could Cost You $72,000 (or More)

Let’s break this down: hiring a decent in-house content creator can cost you up to $72,000 a year. That's before you factor in health insurance, software subscriptions, productivity gaps, and the three rounds of Slack approvals it takes to get a caption past legal.

A single influencer post can cost anywhere from $5,000 to $10,000 depending on follower count and platform placement. Now multiply that by a full campaign, then multiply that by the number of times you’ll refresh the metrics hoping something moves the needle.

Or—and hear this loud—you could build a user-generated content strategy that costs you nearly nothing and performs better. We’re not talking theory. We’re talking UGC ads delivering 4x the click-through rate of brand-created content, and slicing cost-per-click in half.

So if you're not using UGC, it's not because it doesn't work—it's because you're still under the illusion that paying more means performing better.

You Don’t Need Another Brainstorm. You Need a Backbone

Your brand is not short on ideas. It’s short on courage. The kind of courage it takes to admit that strangers on the internet are better at convincing your customers than your creative director’s best work.

User-generated content contests are a no-brainer. They generate hype. They invite participation. And they turn your audience into distribution engines—without a single cent going to a media buyer. More importantly, they give you something you can’t script: social credibility. Try doing that with a paid ad and a “motivational” stock image.

But—and this matters—don’t be that brand that skips the fine print. Before you launch anything that asks users to contribute content, get your user-generated content policy in order. Define usage rights. Clarify ownership. Respect privacy. Because legal fallout over a TikTok duet isn’t a great line on your annual report.

Letting UGC Sit on the Sidelines Is the Most Expensive Marketing Decision You’ll Make This Year

If your user-generated content strategy is still collecting dust behind a campaign folder marked “Q3 Maybe,” you’re not protecting your brand. You’re setting fire to its potential and calling it caution.

You’re not “waiting for the right moment.” You’re watching your audience out-market you in real-time—and they’re not even on payroll.

And the irony is you could’ve had it all for free.

How to Get People to Create UGC (Without Begging, Bribing, or Looking Desperate)

Most brands butcher their user-generated content strategy because they approach it like a charity drive. “Please tag us!” “Share your thoughts!” “Use our hashtag!” The energy is needy.

The truth is, your customers don’t owe you content—but if you play this right, they’ll give it to you anyway because it makes them look good. That’s the point: UGC should feel like a win for your audience, not a chore disguised as engagement.

If people aren’t proudly associating with your brand online, your problem isn’t UGC. Your problem is relevance.

Make It Worth Showing Off

If your brand doesn’t feel worth sharing, don’t expect a flood of content just because you dropped a hashtag.

UGC happens when you build something people want to be seen using. That’s the entire reason Apple doesn’t need to remind anyone to use #ShotOniPhone. People use it because it’s a flex.

This isn’t just a vibe—it’s strategy. Your user-generated content strategy needs to ask one question constantly: Why would someone want this to show up on their profile?

If you can’t answer that, you’re not ready to run UGC.

Stop Asking. Start Creating FOMO.

Here’s how to encourage user-generated content without sounding like you’re asking for spare change: build FOMO.

Make UGC look like a club people feel left out of. Lululemon’s #thesweatlife didn’t go viral because of incentives. It exploded because everyone was posting it. Suddenly, not being part of it looked weird.

UGC isn’t built by asking—it’s built by watching others and thinking, “Damn, I want in.”

If You Must Incentivize, Do It Quietly

Loyalty programs are fantastic. Brand loyalty programs that subtly double as UGC engines? Even better.

Take Sephora’s Beauty Insider program: not only does it offer perks, it drives content creation. People share their makeup hauls, reviews, and looks for the clout and the points. It feels fun. Not transactional.

Your loyalty program shouldn’t scream “Please promote us!” It should whisper, “Look how cool our insiders are.” That’s how you encourage user-generated content without killing the vibe.

Turn It Into a Game, Not a Gig

Contests are fine, but here’s the difference between one that works and one that flops: fun.

When TikTok trends pop off, it’s not because there’s a reward—it’s because it feels like a challenge. Brands like Red Bull and Doritos have weaponized gamified UGC for years by simply turning their audience into players, not participants.

Make the content creation feel like play, not work. That’s the move.

Feature Your People or Forget It

People don’t create UGC for your metrics. They create it for their ego.

And that’s not shade. It’s how this works.

Want more UGC?

Show off the people already posting. Share it on your socials. Pin it to your product pages. Build a hall-of-fame highlight reel. Not because you’re being nice—but because recognition breeds participation. That’s the loop. Feed it.

{{form-component}}

You Don’t Need to Beg. You Need to Be Worth It.

If your current user-generated content strategy involves passive requests, empty hashtags, and the occasional giveaway—start over.

UGC isn’t a transaction. It’s a reflex. But only if your brand feels like something worth talking about. If you’ve built something strong, you won’t need to ask. People will do it without thinking.

Because posting your brand becomes a reflection of them—and that’s always the endgame.

If You’re Not Using UGC, You’re Losing Money. Period.

Let’s not sugarcoat it: if you’re still pretending UGC is “optional,”—you’re bleeding budget.

User-generated content is the reason some brands are still breathing. It boosts conversions by up to 29%, makes ads four times more clickable, and builds trust faster than any glossy campaign your agency cooked up in a panic.

Your audience already creates the content. Your competitors are already repurposing it. And if you're not, you're literally giving them free marketing fuel.

Yes, user-generated content best practices matter. Give credit. Stay legal. Moderate intelligently. But if “brand control” is the reason you're ignoring UGC, you're not protecting the brand—you’re shrinking it.

The truth is… if your brand vanished tomorrow and no one posted about it… you never actually had one.

Polls just dropped in ZoomSphere, and we couldn’t be more excited.

Whether you're team LinkedIn, team X, or somewhere in between, you can now create, schedule, and track polls right from your Scheduler. That means more engagement, more audience insights, and way fewer missed chances to ask questions like, "What is your favourite TikTok trend?"

But hold up. This isn't just about fun questions (though we’re all for those too). Polls are low-effort, high-reward tools that smart marketers are using to drive strategy, start conversations, and spark reactions that actually matter.

Why Should You Be Using Polls

Polls are kind of like the cheat code of social media engagement. Here's why:

• People love to click things: Engagement doesn't get easier than choosing between 2–4 options.
• They give you instant feedback: What does your audience actually think? Ask.
• They spark conversation: One vote leads to a comment, which leads to a thread.
• They feed the algorithm: Platforms reward interaction, and polls bring it fast.

Polls are also a great weapon when it comes to content strategy. They give you real audience insight without a lengthy survey or expensive research. Want to know what your followers care about? Let them tell you, and watch your engagement spike while you're at it.

You can use them to:

• Validate content ideas before you invest time and budget
• Test new products, feature names, or campaign concepts
• Crowdsource opinions for blogs, product development, or just fun
• Start lighthearted convos (X or Threads? Or Bluesky?)
• Break up the feed with something quick and tappable

{{cta-component}}

The Data Doesn't Lie: Polls Perform

If you're still wondering whether polls are worth your time, let’s look at the data.

According to SocialInsider, polls generated the highest impression rate on LinkedIn in 2024. That means a five-minute poll can easily outperform that perfectly curated carousel you spent four hours creating. This doesn’t mean you should post only polls, but they definitely deserve a spot in your marketing mix.

At the same time, X's feed moves fast. Like, blink-and-it's-gone fast. Polls stand out because they invite people to share their opinion (and let's be honest, we all love doing that). In fact, polls on X tend to get more engagement than other content types, so whether you're riding a trend or just asking for quick feedback, they're well worth trying.

And it doesn't end with the reach! Polls open the door to a two-way conversation with your audience. That kind of interaction builds a stronger community, raises brand perception, and helps you make more informed decisions.

‍Bottom line: polls work because people love to participate. And in a world where attention is currency, that’s a serious win.

Best Practices

Now that we know polls really work, let's get into some best practices you should keep in mind while creating them:

• Start with intention. Polls shouldn’t be filler. Ask questions that matter and support your bigger goals. That means you can ask a question on Friday and use the answers to kick off Monday with content that reflects it.
• Keep it short and scroll-stopping. No one wants to read a question twice and still not know what you're asking. Clarity wins.
• Always follow up. Don’t ghost your audience. Share the results, reflect them in your next post, and turn them into a conversation (especially if you're touching on interesting or bold topics).
• Reply to the comments. Did your poll spark a conversation? Congrats, now it’s time to dive in, reply, and start building those connections.
• Think about timing. Keep it open long enough to gather feedback (3-5 days usually works well), but short enough to feel timely and actionable.

What the Pros Are Saying About Polls

Polls are a quiet gem when it comes to LinkedIn and X strategy. They're fast, interactive, and (when used right) incredibly engaging. We’ve seen pros use them to guide content, test ideas, and build stronger connections with their audience. Here’s what they had to say:

How to Use Polls in ZoomSphere

Creating polls in ZoomSphere is super easy, and you can do it for both LinkedIn and X.

LinkedIn Polls

You can post polls to both your LinkedIn Page and Personal Profile directly from the Scheduler. Simply create a new post, select LinkedIn as your platform, and choose “Poll” as the post type. Add your question, include up to four answers, and set the poll duration (either 1 day, 3 days, 1 week, or 2 weeks).

Once it’s published, you can track the results in the post preview.

X (Twitter) Polls

For X, the setup is just as smooth. Choose X in the Scheduler, set your question and up to four answer options, then choose your duration anywhere from 5 minutes to 7 days. Schedule or publish like any other post and watch the feedback roll in.

💡 Pro tip: Use Quick Notes to mark the voting duration and Quick Tasks to remind yourself to check the final results.

Your Turn

The feature’s live, the audience is ready, and the scroll never stops. Drop a poll this week and see how quickly the engagement rolls in.

And if you haven’t tried ZoomSphere yet, now’s the perfect time. Start your free trial and get your first poll live in minutes!

You Spent $150K on Brand Strategy, and Tammy with a Bad Experience Just Burned It All Down in a Comment

Brand perception isn’t built in Canva. It’s not sculpted in Slack threads or during your agency’s Monday morning brainstorms over almond milk lattes. It’s born in silence—then gutted, glorified, or ground to dust in the comments section while your social team is off “circling back.”

All it takes is one unpaid intern forgetting context. One automated reply under a furious thread. One “LOL” where an apology should’ve been.

Burger King UK tried a joke in 2021. X called HR.

If you still believe your online brand image is dictated by your branding guidelines, here’s the reality: your customer perception of brands is shaped by replies, receipts, and how fast you clap back when things go sideways.

Your brand identity strategies can’t save you there. Only presence can.

Cancel Culture Doesn’t Have Office Hours

Scheduled content is essential. But it’s not enough when things go sideways. The comment section doesn’t sleep, and neither does TikTok’s algorithm.

You’re not just being watched. You’re being screen-recorded, quoted out of context, turned into a meme, and dissected by people who don’t even follow you. And no, that dusty apology template from 2019 won’t save you.

People don’t just cancel—they coordinate.

There was a time when a bad PR moment meant a quiet editor’s note. Now it means a hashtag, a Change.org petition, a Reddit thread that hits front page, and a CNN screenshot before your team has finished drafting the Slack message.

Case in point: Balenciaga’s 2022 “bondage bear” campaign.

The public didn't just critique it—they organized a full-blown digital protest. Hashtags surged. Influencers distanced. Kim Kardashian—the literal face of postmodern brand partnerships—paused her endorsement and publicly questioned the brand's values. You know it's bad when the influencer rethinks the contract.

You can’t mute the mob. But you can manage the mic.

Look, cancel culture isn’t random. It follows patterns. Delayed responses, passive apologies, and “we’re looking into it” fluff are red flags.

What you do next in the comments section isn’t PR—it's brand crisis management in real time. It’s advocacy or silence. One buys you time. The other guarantees screenshots.

If 86% of people won’t buy from brands with bad reviews, what do you think they do with ones that double down on tone-deafness?

So if you're still treating your comments like noise, be ready when they turn into an online brand image obituary. Cancel culture in marketing doesn’t wait for context—it waits for your next mistake.

Brands Are Getting Roasted Alive — And Paying for It

Brand perception shifts in crisis. Publicly. With receipts. Then reposted by someone who doesn’t even buy your product but still has thoughts.

In a ResearchGate study, 58% of brands caught in social media firestorms saw immediate damage to public perception. But here’s the thing: 40% never recovered. Not in Q2. Not in Q-anything. Not even after their PR firm invoiced six figures. That’s the shelf life of silence and “we’re listening” energy in a crisis.

The internet doesn’t forget. Your audience remember who replied and who retreated.

Shein: Loved, Loathed, and Still Trending

Let’s talk contradictions.

Shein is what happens when massive customer communities, discount, and questionable ethics crash into each other at full speed.

It’s one of the most searched fashion retailers online. It’s also one of the most criticized for everything from labor practices to greenwashing. They get a constant loop of “add to cart” followed by TikTok takedowns.

That’s what happens when brand reputation management doesn’t scale with virality. Your customers keep buying — and dragging you at the same time. A masterclass in what happens when you build a castle on shaky perception.

Skims: The Brand Positioning That Doesn't Miss

Now, contrast that with Skims.

Same internet. Same microscope. But instead of scrambling, Skims leans in. Every campaign is with calculated inclusivity—body diversity, real customers, actual cultural touchpoints.

You don’t need to like Kim Kardashian to admit the brand isn’t winging it. It’s a playbook in strategic brand positioning tactics. The audience sees consistency, transparency, and—shockingly—humility.

While other brands plead for second chances, Skims writes the rules in real-time. And when trolls come for them, their customer perception of brands is so solid, the community handles it for them.

Communities Don't Just Clap—They Burn Too

You can’t “build community” and disappear when that same community has questions. Whether you’re a startup or a global label, your online loyalty squad becomes your unofficial PR team.

If you’ve invested in surface-level brand identity and neglected relationship-building, your customer communities will notice. And when the receipts go live, it’s not the crisis that hurts—it’s the silence that follows.

Here’s the thing: you don’t get to choose when a fire starts. But you sure as hell get to choose whether you answer the smoke alarm or not.

Silence Is a Statement. And It’s Not Saying Anything Good

There’s a myth floating around boardrooms that silence is strategic. It’s not. It’s guilt—just in lowercase.

When you ghost your own comment section, you’re broadcasting indifference. And the public reads it loud and clear. In fact, a review found that brands who respond to negative reviews are 35% more likely to retain customers. Those that stay silent are blacklisted.

And no, letting your social team “monitor the situation” while you finish your campaign deck doesn’t count as brand trust building. Your silence is a comment. Your inaction is a reply.

{{cta-component}}

The Bystander Effect and How It’s Killing Brand Trust

Psychology has a name for this mess: the bystander effect. When people see something go wrong and nobody steps in, they assume it’s because no one cares—or worse, because everyone agrees with the problem.

If a customer drops a public complaint and your brand doesn’t show up? Your silence signals consent. And it doesn’t take long before others join in. Now you’re not just dealing with one angry customer. You’re managing a full-blown perception crisis, compounded by everyone who saw you flinch and said nothing.

United Airlines Paid the Price of a 48-Hour Silence

In 2017, United Airlines forcibly removed a paying passenger from an overbooked flight. The incident was filmed. The internet exploded. And the brand took nearly two full days to release a coherent response.

The fallout was swift. United lost nearly $1 billion in market value within 24 hours . All because they treated brand crisis management like an afterthought. That delay rewrote their online brand image in real-time.

Your Brand Awareness Techniques Are Useless If You Ghost Your Audience

You can push all the brand awareness techniques you like — influencer campaigns, polished visuals, trend-hopping Reels — but they mean nothing if you vanish when your audience actually speaks up.

If you want to build customer communities that last, you don’t just respond when it’s convenient. You show up when it’s uncomfortable. You acknowledge when something’s off. That’s how real brand positioning tactics work in practice, not theory.

The Backhanded Compliment That Saved Wendy’s

Let’s be honest — if most brands tweeted like Wendy’s, their legal teams would stage a walkout. But that’s exactly the point.

While others still copy-paste polite apologies under passive-aggressive comments, Wendy’s took the internet’s worst instincts and made them part of their brand DNA. They didn’t play defense — they built a throne in the middle of the food fight.

And it paid off. The brand went from just-another-QSR to a textbook case in brand differentiation methods that worked across comment sections, campaign assets, and customer expectations.

This wasn’t accidental virality. It was deliberate tone control — so consistent, the audience stopped asking if Wendy’s would clap back. They asked when.

Humor Isn't a Risk. In 2025, It's Brand Advocacy in Disguise.

Let’s kill the myth: self-aware humor isn’t “too casual.” It’s comment-section survival gear.

Wendy’s isn’t beloved for being funny. It’s respected because it knows exactly when to be funny. That kind of precision is brand crisis management. It turns potential blowups into public loyalty trials — where your audience often rules in your favor.

Humor + speed + consistency = advocacy.

When done right, your customers will defend you for free.

Stop Replying Like a Bot. Nobody’s Filing HR Reports in the Comments.

You don’t build brand trust by smothering every negative comment with a “We’re so sorry to hear this.” That’s empathy on autopilot — and audiences see through it.

Some comments need context. Some need facts. And yes, some need heat.

Wendy’s figured out that not answering with templated PR statements was what made them more human. Their approach wasn’t to pretend to be perfect — it was to acknowledge flaws faster than the critics could meme them.

That’s how you flip a complaint: with tone, timing, and truth. It’s not “edgy,” it’s emotionally intelligent. And that’s exactly what brand trust building looks like in the digital age.

Wendy’s Didn’t Just Build an Audience. It Cultivated a Digital Defense System.

This is what most brands miss: Wendy’s didn’t just grow followers. It activated advocates.

By being consistent, real, and unapologetically self-aware, Wendy’s trained its audience to expect personality — and defend it. And when your brand community starts calling out the trolls before your team even sees the comment? That’s earned advocacy.

Who’s Actually in Charge of Brand Perception?

Not Your CMO. Not Your Guidelines. Not Even Your Campaigns.

Look, your brand perception isn’t in your deck. It’s in your comment section.

It’s being shaped right now by an intern on TikTok who guessed their way through your post. It’s being tested by a customer who tagged you in a 17-second Reel, got ignored, and is now writing a 7-part LinkedIn teardown. It’s being reshaped by someone in a subreddit you’ve never visited, publicly dragging your FAQ copy.

Your brand is in court every day — and your audience is the jury. They’re not waiting for your perfectly-worded brand manifesto. They’re watching your receipts.

Ownership Is Shared. Perception Is Crowdsourced.

Brands that still act like reputation is top-down are the same ones doing quarterly rebrands because they “lost relevance.”

Here’s the actual issue: you don’t control your brand’s image — your audience does. And the best ones co-own it with you. Not because you begged. Because you earned it.

That’s what customer communities do when they trust you: they defend, repost, clarify, and sometimes — drag you constructively instead of burying you.

You don’t build community by asking for UGC. You build it by actually showing up when it’s inconvenient.

Aerie: The Brand That Replied Instead of Retouching

You want a working model? Try Aerie. 

No filters, no face-tuning, no quiet deletions. They let real customers talk. They replied. They kept replying. And it stuck.

They’ve now got a legit spike in brand advocacy that didn’t need influencer fluff. Just visibility, humility, and consistency.

That’s what actual loyalty programs are supposed to feel like. Not cashback gimmicks — just real affinity built in public.

Brand Advocacy Isn’t a KPI. It’s a Reaction.

You don’t build advocacy with slogans. You build it when someone tags you in a rant at 2:14am… and gets a human response at 2:20.

Because yes — people don’t expect brands to be perfect anymore. They just expect them to respond like they’re awake.

Don’t Let One ‘LOL This Is Trash’ Tank Your Q4

There’s a special kind of arrogance in brands that still treat comment sections like clutter.

One offhand “LOL this is trash” under a promoted post seems harmless — until your CFO forwards you a thread from Reddit that ends with “hard pass on this brand.” At that point, your budget isn’t the only thing tanking. Your brand trust just took a hit from a comment that no one replied to.

And yes, your silence was a reply.

Brands that think perception is built in campaigns and lost in crises aren’t wrong — just incomplete. It’s maintained in comments. And the faster you accept that, the faster you can apply actual brand positioning tactics that keep you from looking like you outsource your dignity to legal.

Respond Fast. Like, “Pause-the-meeting” Fast.

If your response window is longer than your shipping time, you're not protecting perception — you're padding it.

A review from Harvard Business showed that businesses that respond to negative reviews quickly retain more customers.

What qualifies as “quick”?

Within two hours — not “by the end of business.”

The internet doesn’t run on office hours. Neither does outrage.

Fast replies show you're not scrambling for permission. They signal that your brand isn’t just aware, it's awake. That’s the core of effective brand awareness techniques today — not campaign reach, but real-time relevance.

Know When It’s Feedback — and When It’s Just Noise

Not every troll deserves a thesis. But not every angry comment is trolling, either. Learn the difference.

Spam wants attention. Feedback wants a fix. If you’re treating both the same way (or worse — ignoring both), you’re handing your brand advocacy over to your loudest critics.

Monitor sentiment across customer communities, and let your frontline teams escalate things that feel like red flags before the public does. Because if a frustrated customer tweets and you don’t respond, they’ll assume your community will. That assumption rarely ends in your favor.

Build Better Products (Yes, Straight From the Comments)

The comment section is also where free R&D lives.

Most brands over-index on surveys and underuse the literal live testing lab they already have. Your customers are handing you friction points and feature requests in real time. When you treat that like white noise, you don’t just miss improvement opportunities — you signal that brand loyalty is a one-way transaction.

Use feedback from the comments to identify trends in usability, pricing objections, or product confusion. Your most vocal critics are often your most invested users — and fixing something they flagged publicly can turn them into public advocates just as fast.

Reward Loyalty in Public. Always.

Want to earn love? Respond to rage.

Want to earn loyalty? Respond to support — in public.

Too many brands hyper-fixate on crisis mode and forget the people already standing up for them. If someone drops a positive comment, quotes your post with praise, or defends you in a reply thread: reward it. Like it. Thank them. Share it. Don’t leave them hanging.

This triggers the reciprocity bias — people tend to favor brands that engage with them, especially when it’s unexpected. That tiny interaction builds deeper trust than any glossy testimonial video you’ll overpay for later.

Your brand advocacy doesn’t start in influencer spreadsheets. It starts in how you make regular people feel seen in public.

{{form-component}}

Train Your Social Team Like They’re Negotiating Hostage Situations

Seriously.

Your social team shouldn’t be interns with access to Canva. They should know tone calibration, escalation routes, brand positioning, and — if you’re smart — real-time decision autonomy. If they have to wait three hours for a manager to approve a 2-line reply, you're setting perception on fire in slow motion.

The teams who win the internet don’t just post cute stuff. They reply with confidence, empathy, and clarity. Every comment they handle well is one less thread your PR agency needs to clean up.

You don’t need a million-dollar campaign to earn trust. But you can lose seven figures in revenue over one comment that went sideways because you were too slow, too stiff, or too silent.

So yeah — “LOL this is trash” can’t kill your Q4 on its own. But your non-response might.

You're Not Getting Cancelled for the Mistake. You're Getting Cancelled for Pretending It Wasn't One.

The internet’s memory is long, but its mercy comes faster than brands deserve — if, and only if, you show up while it still matters.

40% of brands suffer lasting damage after a social media crisis. Not because the crisis was unfixable. But because they didn’t act like it mattered until it already did.

Public apology paragraphs mean nothing if you ignored the comment section when it was burning.

That’s not crisis management — that’s reputation CPR after the brand’s already flatlined.

You want brand loyalty in 2025?

It starts with showing your receipts. In public. In real time. No ghosting, no “our team is looking into this,” no three-day blackout while your agency writes something safe.

Say something. Say it fast. Say it like you give a damn. Or get ready to trend for the wrong reasons. Again.

Does social media ever take a break? Guess not.

We’re back with another quick recap of what went down this week. So sit back, catch up, and get into it – before you drift off into weekend mode.

What’s new on Instagram?

Double Speed Playback for Reels Has Arrived

Scrolling in a rush? Instagram has you covered. The platform just added a 2x playback option for Reels, letting users speed through content at double speed.

Whether you’re watching meme edits or cramming info from how-to videos, it’s a small but mighty update.

“Edits” App Teased by Instagram Chief

Instagram chief Adam Mosseri confirmed in a post that a standalone “Edits” app is coming, and it should be landing in the next couple of weeks. The goal? To give creators even better tools for crafting engaging content.

The best part? It’ll be free. Mosseri did mention that some premium features might be added later on, but the plan is to keep most of the tools available at no cost.

What’s new on Facebook?

Facebook Is Testing a “Voice Mode” for Stories (aka TikTok 2.0?)‍

Facebook is cooking up something new for Stories: a “Voice Mode” feature that lets you narrate over images and videos with a more prominent voice-first design. Think TikTok’s voiceover tool... but make it Meta.

If rolled out widely, this could bring a new wave of audio-driven content creation to the platform, and possibly even more Story engagement (finally?).

What’s new on Threads?

Filters and Effects Are Coming to Threads Photos‍

Threads is finally catching up in the visual game. The platform is working on the ability to add filters and effects to photos, making it easier to post aesthetic or stylized content without leaving the app.

It’s a step toward more creative expression, and potentially more engaging feeds.

What’s new on YouTube?

New “Inspiration” Tools‍

YouTube is rolling out three new inspiration features to help creators spark ideas and keep the content flowing:

1. Brainstorm from Anywhere
   You’ll now get integrated comments and data from your past videos, making the brainstorming process inside Studio more intuitive and seamless.
2. Hooks
   AI-powered suggestions designed to help you craft stronger intros that grab attention and boost viewer retention. Because let’s be honest, those first few seconds really matter.
3. Quick Saves
   Found a great idea while you’re mid-scroll? You can now save it instantly from your idea list, right when inspiration strikes.

What’s up with TikTok?

Trump Says TikTok Deal Is (Finally) Coming‍

Trump says a deal to sell TikTok’s U.S. operations will be finalized by Saturday, just before the latest deadline hits. The app is still owned by China’s ByteDance, which violates a U.S. law passed earlier this year.

There’s strong interest from buyers, and Trump, who originally called for a ban in 2020, claims he’s the one making the final call. Whether it actually happens? We’ll know soon.

When Brands Throw Shade, Consumers Grab Popcorn

Brand rivalries in marketing campaigns don’t sell actually sneakers, burgers, or soft drinks. They sell something louder: dominance. Look, this isn’t about quality or features—it’s about who can steal the spotlight, drag the other brand publicly, and walk off with a smug smirk and a higher Q4. Apple and Samsung didn’t just advertise—they launched cultural airstrikes. Pepsi humiliated Coke so badly, Coca-Cola literally rewrote itself.

When brands start beef, it’s rarely product-first—it’s ego-first. Because nothing boosts recall like a public battle.

In this article, we’ll tear open the wires behind these campaigns: the behavioral triggers, the tribal addiction, the dopamine loops… and the part no one likes to say out loud—sometimes the brag matters more than the product ever did.

Why Humans Crave Brand Wars

You’d think consumers buy based on features, benefits, or—wild idea—value. Wrong decade. In the current arena of brand rivalry campaigns, people pick sides like it’s a moral obligation. Apple fans won’t touch Samsung, even if it folds their laundry. Adidas loyalists won’t admit Nike makes a better sole. We’re not in the business of preference anymore—we’re deep in identity warfare.

This isn't strategy. This is limbic-level loyalty.

Your Brain on Beef: What Actually Happens

When brands go to war, consumers don’t just watch—they engage. Research confirms that marketing wars between brands activate the amygdala, the brain’s fight-or-fanboy response system. We’re hardwired to interpret rivalry as drama, and drama gets attention—fast.

That’s why a petty Twitter jab between two logos can outperform your polished campaign reel. Conflict drives memory. People don’t just remember the ad—they retell it, debate it, defend it.

It’s tribalism in a hoodie.

The Real Effect on Behavior (And Why Marketers Should Care)

The impact of brand wars on consumer behavior is far from theoretical. When Pepsi launched the “Pepsi Challenge” in the 1970s, it didn’t just prove people liked the taste more—it forced Coca-Cola to rewrite its formula. That single rivalry stunt led to New Coke, one of the most expensive brand faceplants in history.

You’d think Coke would bounce back by ignoring it. Instead, the drama worked—for both sides. Brand heat = attention = sales. Even now, 40+ years later, Coke and Pepsi still throw the occasional shade because it keeps their names in headlines and their fans ready to tweet.

Brand Personality: Your Real Product

Did you know that 45% of Gen Z consumers say a brand’s personality influences loyalty more than the product itself?

So when you launch brand rivalry campaigns, you're not just attacking competitors. You're solidifying your tribe’s self-perception. Apple = sleek rebel. Samsung = pragmatic innovator. The product is secondary. The posture is everything.

The Brands That Made Battles an Artform (and a Tax Write-Off)

Some brands run ads. Others enter marketing wars between brands like they’ve got personal beef—and a CFO who’s fine with weaponizing the media budget. The result is campaigns so bold, so unapologetically petty, they’ve earned a spot in marketing textbooks and shareholder meetings alike.

This isn’t advertising. This is sport. And these are the brands rewrote the rules of competitive marketing tactics.

Burger King vs. McDonald’s: The One-Cent Humiliation

Burger King didn’t just troll McDonald’s—they geofenced their physical locations and offered Whoppers for one cent… but only if the order was placed while standing near a McDonald’s. That wasn’t a discount. That was a middle finger wrapped in location data.

The stunt—officially called the Whopper Detour—forced users to download the BK app, activate location services, and participate in what can only be described as petty genius. It was the kind of strategic disrespect that made other CMOs sweat.

The receipts:

• 1.5 million app downloads in 9 days
• 3.5 billion impressions
• Mobile order sales shot up 54%

Samsung vs. Apple: $1 Billion in Legal Fees and Worth Every Cent

Samsung’s 2011 “The Next Big Thing Is Already Here” campaign mocked Apple so hard, Apple sued. And lost. And sued again. And paid. And sued again.

The ads roasted Apple fans for queuing outside stores, implied iPhones were outdated on arrival, and made Android users look like the ones with inside knowledge.

And it worked. Hard.

• Samsung's smartphone market share jumped from 23% to 30% in a single year
• The Galaxy S III overtook the iPhone 4S in Q3 2012
• Samsung's brand value surged 20% after the campaign

Even with over $1 billion in legal costs during the feud, Samsung came out stronger in key markets. The impact of brand wars on consumer behavior is clear. Consumers don’t always side with the winner—they side with whoever sounds like they’re winning.

Pepsi vs. Coca-Cola: The Feud That Broke Coke

The Pepsi Challenge didn’t just pit two sodas against each other—it backed Coca-Cola into such a tight corner that it did the unthinkable: changed its formula. Actually. New Coke happened because Pepsi ran taste tests in malls and proved that people liked its flavor more—at least when they weren’t told which brand it was.

Coke panicked, launched New Coke in 1985… and got dragged by the entire public. Consumers hated it. Pepsi gloated. Coca-Cola stock trembled.

Within months, Coca-Cola backtracked and re-released the original under the name “Coca-Cola Classic.”

This remains one of the most extreme examples of brand feuds in advertising—a campaign that literally changed the market leader’s product and embarrassed them into submission.

So, What’s the Actual Lesson Here?

You can’t afford to be bland in a market that rewards boldness. These aren’t just stories of sass and shade—these are legit case studies of advertising battles between brands that shifted public sentiment, redefined product loyalty, and exposed how fast emotional loyalty can overtake rational preference.

Because the impact of brand wars on consumer behavior, when done right, doesn’t just push conversions. They push narratives. And in a world where attention is currency, the brand that owns the narrative wins.

The Brands That Tried… and Failed

Some brands try to pick a fight and end up slapping their own reflection. Because starting a feud without a sharp brand positioning against competitors is like throwing a punch mid-yawn—no impact, no edge, just awkward regret and public silence.

What follows are not success stories. These are brand competition case studies that prove one thing: clout-chasing isn’t a good strategy—it’s a boardroom panic attack with a media budget.

{{cta-component}}

Chevrolet vs. Ford: When “Authenticity” Becomes Ammunition for Memes

Chevy tried to tug at authenticity with its “Real People, Not Actors” campaign—a series that seemed designed to give Ford a free laugh. Chevy owners were surprised on-camera by “real reactions” to features. Except none of it felt real. It read like a script written by an algorithm trained on daytime TV.

Ford fans tore it apart. The internet turned it into a meme lab. Parody videos went viral, and Chevy ended up spending millions to air a campaign that actively fed its competitor's fan base.

Lesson: If your biggest flex is “we don’t use actors,” you might need to reassess your brand differentiation in competitive markets.

Microsoft vs. Apple (Rebuttal Edition): Too Late, Too Clunky, Too… Microsoft

By the time Microsoft tried to respond to Apple’s “I’m a Mac” series with its own comeback (“Laptop Hunters,” “I’m a PC”), Apple had already lapped them in perception, tone, and cultural capital. Microsoft’s ads weren’t wrong—they just weren’t sharp.

Worse, they positioned themselves as the “sensible choice,” which translated to Gen Z and Millennials as “boring uncle energy.” The tone missed the sarcasm of the original Apple campaign and instead felt like an HR manager had written it. This was a real-time reminder that marketing to Gen Z requires more than being factual—you need to be culturally fluent.

IHOP vs. IHOB: A Rebrand That Should’ve Stayed in the Group Chat

In 2018, IHOP announced it was changing its name to IHOB—International House of Burgers. The goal was to create buzz and show off its burger menu. But in reality, it caused total internet chaos.

Yes, they got attention. Social media exploded. Sales went up… temporarily. But the long-term brand confusion was so severe, investors started questioning the leadership’s judgment. By 2020, IHOP’s stock had dropped over 20%, and traffic didn’t recover.

You can’t build long-term equity on temporary confusion. It works in memes, not in markets.

Why Rivalry = Engagement 

You see, brand rivalries are not risky. They’re rocket fuel. And no, you’re not just “increasing share of voice.” You’re giving your audience a hit of neurochemical chaos they didn’t know they needed.

Feuds trigger the same brain activity as scandal. That’s a measurable surge in amygdala activity—the part of your brain that lights up during fights, drama, and cliffhangers. It’s why the right kind of feud doesn’t just trend—it hijacks your feed and dares you to scroll past.

Attention Isn’t Given. It’s Taken.

Look at the data. Successful brand rivalry campaigns consistently outperform traditional media strategies when it comes to attention metrics—clicks, comments, shares, and repeat impressions. Not because they’re louder. Because they’re stickier.

A standard brand ad tells you what they do.
A battle shows you why they matter.

Because when brands drag each other in public, consumers don’t just watch. They invest. They compare. They screenshot. They pick sides. You’re no longer just another ad in the timeline—you’re the main event.

Status Signaling Is a Real Thing. And Rivalries Hack It.

This isn’t just entertainment. This is strategic psychology. Research shows that when brands engage in public advertising battles between brands, they trigger a status effect—brands that are being talked about in conflict are seen as more dominant, more relevant, and more culturally important.

It doesn’t even matter who wins the feud.
What matters is that you're important enough to fight with.

This is how feuds quietly unlock strategies for outperforming competitors in marketing—not through better budgets or bigger billboards, but by becoming socially contagious. No one forwards a product feature list. But people will absolutely DM a savage brand tweet.

Scandal Outlasts Spec Sheets. Every. Single. Time.

Specs don’t go viral. Sass does.
Because no one reposts your technical differentiator. They repost a clapback.

That’s why some of the most iconic campaigns—T-Mobile vs. Verizon, Audi vs. BMW, Pepsi vs. Coke—aren’t remembered for the offer or the tagline. They’re remembered because they bit back. Those moments got embedded into pop culture, not just marketing dashboards.

The best part is you can absolutely win without “winning.” Just by starting the right fire, you force people to care. And in a market overflowing with beige, apathy is your real competition—not your rival’s product.

But Do These Rivalries Actually Work?

Short answer: Yes. Stupidly well.

Longer answer: They work so well that brands are willing to lose money short-term, just to own headlines and live rent-free in people’s heads. And yes — there are receipts.

The Numbers behind the Nonsense

Let’s start with Burger King’s now-infamous McWhopper proposal—an open letter to McDonald’s proposing a peace burger. Cute, right?

They spent $0 in paid media. The internet did all the heavy lifting.

That $0 budget turned into 7 billion earned media impressions.

Oh, and it bagged 18 Cannes Lions.

All for a burger collab that never even launched.

That’s comparative advertising strategy— not just outperforming competitors in marketing, but baiting them into silence and still walking away with the attention economy's gold medal.

And that’s not an isolated win.

Samsung got slapped with a $1 billion fine after Apple dragged them into court over design infringement. But while lawyers were sharpening pencils, Samsung's sales were doing backflips.

Post-feud, Samsung saw a 38% spike in U.S. market share and the Galaxy S3 outsold the iPhone 4S in Q3 2012.

Yes, the lawsuit cost them money. But the shade paid it back with interest.

When "Brand Value" Gets a Shot of Adrenaline

Feuds don’t just boost sales. They make brands more memorable — which is usually a more valuable currency long-term.

Take Doritos vs. Pringles. Doritos launched a cheeky attack ad implying Pringles were “stackable boredom,” and saw a 12% increase in unaided brand recall immediately after the campaign aired. That kind of lift in recall doesn’t just stay in PowerPoints. It feeds every future campaign.

Even when things get dicey, the firepower is hard to ignore. Gillette’s “Toxic Masculinity” ad wasn’t technically a rivalry, but it took a cultural stance that triggered a million think pieces. It sparked 60% engagement growth across digital, while also leading to a 30% drop in sales that year.

So yes — standing for something (or against someone) can cut both ways. But here’s the kicker: Gillette wasn’t trying to be safe. They were trying to be remembered.

The Real ROI of Rivalry

Battles aren’t free. They cost creative risk, social media management therapy, and sometimes legal cleanup. But if the brand positioning against competitors is clear — and the audience sees it as relevant — the trade-off is more than worth it.

And no, it’s not just about impressions or retweets. It’s about entering the market’s bloodstream, without having to scream about specs or run a 30-second product walkthrough ever again.

These are blueprints — proof that competitor advertising campaigns, when backed by real guts and a strong point of view, can do what safe, high-budget, forgettable ads can’t:

Make your brand louder, meaner, sharper… and absolutely unforgettable.

When to Start Beef — And When to Stay in Your Lane

Every marketer loves a good feud. But not every brand should throw hands.

In fact, some brands shouldn’t even clear their throat.

Because starting a rivalry without range is like sending a tweet with zero followers—it might make noise, but it’s not echoing anywhere useful. This section isn’t about buzz. It’s about whether your brand has earned the right to get provocative.

Red Flags: When Starting a Feud Is Just… Sad

Let’s make this simple. If your product underperforms, your reviews reek, and your social pages are a ghost town, firing shots at a competitor won’t mask the decay. It’ll magnify it.

• You have a low-loyalty customer base. You haven’t built trust yet. You’re not in a rivalry—you’re in denial.
• Your budget is tight. Battles require consistency, scale, and the ability to react fast. If you're still debating whether to boost that carousel post, hold your fire.
• You don’t know what you stand for. If your brand positioning is built on “We’re here too,” then shade isn’t strategy. It’s desperation.

Going into advertising battles between brands without clarity or momentum doesn’t position you as a challenger—it just exposes your weak spot in high-res.

Green Lights: When You’ve Earned the Right to Get Loud

Not all brands should brawl. But some? Some were born for it.

If you’ve got a cult-like customer base, product confidence, and a brand identity that’s loud, clear, and ready to be misunderstood—then yes, the table is set.

• You have a fanbase that will repost your jabs before you even hit send.
• You operate in a saturated market, where differentiation lives in tone and tension.
• You’ve built enough brand equity that a little backlash won’t send you into panic meetings.

These are the brands that use rivalry as a legitimate strategy for outperforming competitors in marketing. Think of Wendy’s. Think of T-Mobile. Think of Burger King in their geofencing, app-hijacking prime.

How to Throw a Legal Punch (Without Wrecking Yourself)

Let’s talk legal. Yes, you can call out a competitor. But no, you can’t misrepresent their product or make unverifiable claims. The U.S., UK, and EU have very real rules around comparative advertising strategies.

So, comparisons must be factually provable, not emotionally satisfying. You can say “We’re cheaper.” You can’t say “They’re trash.”

When analyzing competitor advertising campaigns, stick to verifiable contrasts—price, features, public reviews. And always assume their legal team has notifications turned on.

Also: avoid personal attacks. This is marketing, not playground politics. If it feels petty, it probably is. And if it isn’t relevant to brand differentiation in competitive markets, you’re wasting both your audience’s time and your ad budget.

{{form-component}}

So… Should You Pick a Fight?

Bragging rights don’t sell products. But they do sell relevance, narrative dominance, and status. And in a market where attention is the only real currency, that’s often worth more than margin.

If you’ve paid attention, you’ve seen how the most successful brand rivalry campaigns aren’t about who’s right—they’re about who stays top-of-mind. The best advertising battles between brands don’t end in courtrooms; they end in cultural recall.

But not every brand deserves the mic.
So ask yourself—are you playing to win? Or are you just background noise in someone else’s PR war?

Because the most dangerous mistake isn’t going quiet. It’s thinking you’re in a fight you’re not built to finish.

The smartest brands use rivalry as one of many strategies for outperforming competitors in marketing—not as a substitute for value. Know the difference. Use it well.

At this point, if you're a celebrity and don't have a beauty brand... are you even famous?

From billion-dollar blushes to waitlist-only lip treatments, it feels like every A-lister is throwing their name (and face) on a beauty line. And honestly? It's working. In some cases, these side hustles are outperforming their actual careers.

But beyond the glam, this isn't just a celebrity trend. It's a marketing playbook, and if you squint past the pastel packaging and soft-focus product shots, you'll find lessons every marketer should be stealing.

The Beauty Boom: Why It Actually Matters

Let's start with this: celebrity beauty brands aren't just vanity projects anymore, they're legitimate money machines.

According to NielsenIQ, celebrity-founded beauty brands surpassed $1 billion in sales as of late 2023. That's a 57.8% jump year-over-year, and it's outpacing the entire beauty industry's growth of 11.1% during the same time. Translation? This isn't a phase. It's a takeover.

And the launches keep coming: new names, new lines, new campaigns, and fans keep lining up to buy. It's not just a rush of influencer-fueled capitalism. It's a shift in how brands are built, sold, and scaled in 2025.

Selena Gomez's Rare Beauty is now worth over $2 billion. Rihanna's Fenty Beauty? Estimated at $2.8 billion, contributing significantly to her billionaire status. And Hailey Bieber's Rhode, despite launching just in 2022, has already achieved over $100M in revenue.

{{cta-component}}

Why People Keep Buying (Even When They Know It's Celebrity-Backed)

Yes, the famous face helps. But it's not just about the star power.

The truth? These brands are slaying their marketing game:

• They sell identity, not just product – Buying Rare Beauty doesn't mean you're wearing blush. It means you're emotionally aligned with Selena Gomez, whose brand is rooted in mental health advocacy.
• They get the aesthetic right – Minimalist packaging. Dewy skin. Pastel tones. It's giving luxury and approachability.
• They stand for something – Mental health. Clean ingredients. Inclusivity. Rare Beauty donates 1% of sales to its Rare Impact Fund. Rhode promotes skin barrier health with a less-is-more ethos.
• They know the algorithm – They live on TikTok and IG. Launches feel like viral moments, not corporate announcements. Rare's Soft Pinch blush has gone viral multiple times: because of users, not ads.

Hailey Bieber's Rhode generated a 440,000-person waitlist during its initial launch by leaning into TikTok content that teased her "glazed donut skin" and reposting UGC from early fans.

What Marketers Can Actually Learn From Them

Celebrity beauty brands are basically creator-led DTC startups, but prettier.

Here's what's worth stealing:

• Turn your founder into your story – Even if they're not famous, people connect with people. Put a face on your brand.
• Make your products feel sensory – Think textures, vibes, feelings. Hailey Bieber's Rhode is the perfect example. Styling her skincare with donuts, smoothies, and soft lighting.
• Know your visual language – From fonts to filters, the best brands have a look, and they never deviate from it.
• Lead with values – Rare Beauty puts mental health at the core of their brand. Not in a preachy way, but in a way that builds trust.
• Use UGC as social proof – Content from real people is 50% more trusted than brand content. And it drives conversion. Rhode reposts and features UGC constantly, especially in product launches.

Personal Brands + UGC = The Celebrity Blueprint You Should Be Stealing

Celebrity beauty brands are winning because they're built like modern creator brands:

• A strong personal identity (the celeb)
• A product that matches that identity (the brand)
• A community that amplifies it (fans + UGC)

Take Rhode. Hailey isn't just promoting products—she's reposting fan content, responding to comments, and letting her community co-create the brand. TikTok is filled with GRWM videos featuring Rhode's peptide lip treatments, and Rhode reposts them constantly.

The result? It feels like a friend's skincare routine, not an ad campaign.

The vibe: Less "brand talking at you," more "bestie sharing her faves."

Marketing takeaway:

• Humanize your brand: founders, team, anyone
• Make UGC a core part of your strategy, not an afterthought
• Build a community that feels like it's "in" on the brand, not just buying from it

Bonus? UGC-powered launches get people hyped. Rare Beauty's Soft Pinch blush alone sold $70 million worth in its first year, becoming Sephora's #1 blush with one sold every 3 seconds.

When It Flops (Because Not All Celebrity Brands Hit)

Let's be real, not every celeb beauty brand is a Fenty.

Here's when it doesn't work:

• It feels like a cash grab – No story, no soul, just a logo and some lip gloss
• The celeb doesn't match the vibe – If the personal brand feels off, the product won't feel right either
• There's no reason to care – Weak mission, no unique angle, forgettable visuals = forgettable brand
• It tries too hard to be Gen Z – Please. Stop using slang you don't understand

A good example? When Addison Rae's brand Item Beauty was pulled from Sephora due to lack of demand, proof that TikTok fame alone isn't enough without strategy, cohesion, or consumer trust. According to Business Insider, the brand suffered from low differentiation and inconsistent promotion. Rae stopped posting about the brand just months after its launch.

{{form-component}}

Kim Kardashian's SKKN received early criticism for its high price point and lack of differentiation. Despite Kim's mega-influence, reviews noted it lacked innovation and relied too heavily on aesthetic over function.

Not every celebrity should have a beauty brand. But the ones who do it right? They're redefining what brand loyalty looks like.

Celebrity beauty brands aren't just selling dewy skin, they're selling story, lifestyle, and belonging.

You don't need a stadium tour or 200 million followers to do the same. You just need a clear identity, a strong aesthetic, and a strategy that puts real connection first.

Because in 2025, the most successful brands aren't the loudest. They're the ones that feel the most human.